Today I get this email from Nancy Pelosi ...
Dear Peter,
We’re close -- in fact, we’re less than $4,000 short of a record-breaking January.
Can we count on your support to help put us over the top? Contribute $3 before tonight’s midnight FEC deadline and we'll triple-match your gift >>
With your help we can put an end to the Republicans’ unrelenting war on women, seniors and the middle class.
Let’s prove we have what it takes.
http://dccc.org/Stand-with-Obama
If Obama and the Democrats would prosecute the Wall Street criminals who
caused the "Lesser Depression", enact an
adequate economic stimulus stimulus to recover from it, and get rid of
the corruption under which most congressional decisions are bought
and paid for, I would.
"Yes we can", said Obama.
No they didn't.
I didn't either.
Tuesday, 31 January 2012
Retro Programming Skills
Recently I have received several emails from headhunters with whom I have done business previously, and the nature of said emails nature provokes me to write about this. In recent days I have received the following:
1. Six-month contract for PowerBuilder expert. I don't think I qualify as an expert, but I've spent some serious time wrestling this pig to the ground, and I hate this language.
2. Three-month contract for Access 2003, for the government of Ontario. Who remembers Access 2003? It was so buggy that MS released Access XP a year later, and everyone I know immediately moved to it. Apparently the government of Ontario did not; call it Software Gravity or something; why any organization would prefer to stick to a version known to be riddled with bugs rather than migrate is beyond me. This is not to be interpreted as suggesting an eager adoption of any technology not suffixed by "SP1" or better.
3. Contract for a Clipper developer (6 months anticipated duration, perhaps longer, depending on performance). Ok, I wrote a couple of books about Clipper programming and created a company to sell a few libraries for Clipper programmers, and yes, we sold enough copies to pay the rent and the hydro and the employees, for a few years basking in the sun. But we under-anticipated the adoption of Windows, and missed the boat on transition to this new world, and although we never had to declare bankruptcy, we were forced to close the doors. Although I think that I can claim serious expertise in the world of Clipper programming, I do NOT want to return to the world of DOS, except in a VM and only then for reasons of nostalgia.
4. An offer for a contract specifying a minimum of 4 years' experience in VS C# 2010. Basic arithmetic would deem this requirement impossible, but to mention that is to invite immediate discard into the pile of Rejections.
All this is pretty much OK with me. Most of you may not recognize the name "Jack Layton", a Canadian politician who passed mid-last-year. He was Leader of the Opposition, having won a landslide in Quebec (thanks to his bilingualism and much to the shock of the Parti Quebecois, but that's another story).
Back when Jack and his soon-to-become wife Olivia Chow were City Councillors in Toronto, and the leading software at the time was DOS on IBM-PCs or clones, I wrote the campaign-management software for Jack and OC (that became her nickname). The software was not especially complex; just a couple of dozen tables and a lot of time-sensitive reports. But it did the trick, and in some small way helped Jack and OC hold their positions. I did all that work gratis (free), and took pride in helping, in my small way, the advance of two people who I felt would enhance the political landscape in Canada. I am proud to have made this small contribution to the advance of the NDP agenda within Toronto, and Ontario, and Canada.
The saddest part about this story is that less than a year after Jack's triumph (and the NDP's triumph), Jack passed away from cancer. This might rank as the saddest event in the history of Canadian national politics. Jack redefined the political landscape in Canada, and sadly didn't live long enough to enjoy the fruits of his triumph. This fills me with profound sadness. We go back to the days when he and Olivia were City Counsellors in Toronto. I have known them both since then, even before they were married, and when a departed friend called Dan Heap was still part of the equation.
I began with Jack in the days of DOS. I fondly recall a day in his office. I was the DBA guy and was allowed entry to his office. His DOS computer was passworded. It took me all of three minutes to get past that, and to update his campaign software. When later that day, he arrived at his office and found me working on his updates, he asked, "How did you get in?" And I replied, "Who do you want to keep out? Your average user, or me? Two different levels of protection are required."
This was decades ago, and penetration was easier back then. It remains easy, given certain knowledge, but back then all it took was a reboot from a floppy; now it is (slightly more, but not much) more complicated. Unless you're seriously into computing and programming and security, I venture that I can get in within an hour -- not that I have that intention, but it's not very complicated to penetrate almost every allegedly secure site. Rocket science is not required, in many cases I have investigated.
Most people use immediately-remembered identities such as birthyear, birthmonth+day, surname spelled backwards, nickname of first-born-daughter + initial of one's surname. All such passwords are easily grabbed, knowing even a trite of data about the target. Hence, you are a target. I confess that my own account (too easily deduced) has been compromised, and that's when I learned my lesson; and my lesson is this. Make sure that:
1. Your password consists of at least 10 characters.
2, Your password includes at least a few Capitals, Lower Case letters, and Special Case characters.
3. In case you forget it, that you can deduce it from a Hint or two (for example, My Youngest Sibling; what is not declared is that this name should be entered backwards, right to left, and prepended and suffixed by some special characters. The point is, that if you forget what the password is, you can deduce it from a relatively simple set of rules, known only to you.
A.
1. Six-month contract for PowerBuilder expert. I don't think I qualify as an expert, but I've spent some serious time wrestling this pig to the ground, and I hate this language.
2. Three-month contract for Access 2003, for the government of Ontario. Who remembers Access 2003? It was so buggy that MS released Access XP a year later, and everyone I know immediately moved to it. Apparently the government of Ontario did not; call it Software Gravity or something; why any organization would prefer to stick to a version known to be riddled with bugs rather than migrate is beyond me. This is not to be interpreted as suggesting an eager adoption of any technology not suffixed by "SP1" or better.
3. Contract for a Clipper developer (6 months anticipated duration, perhaps longer, depending on performance). Ok, I wrote a couple of books about Clipper programming and created a company to sell a few libraries for Clipper programmers, and yes, we sold enough copies to pay the rent and the hydro and the employees, for a few years basking in the sun. But we under-anticipated the adoption of Windows, and missed the boat on transition to this new world, and although we never had to declare bankruptcy, we were forced to close the doors. Although I think that I can claim serious expertise in the world of Clipper programming, I do NOT want to return to the world of DOS, except in a VM and only then for reasons of nostalgia.
4. An offer for a contract specifying a minimum of 4 years' experience in VS C# 2010. Basic arithmetic would deem this requirement impossible, but to mention that is to invite immediate discard into the pile of Rejections.
All this is pretty much OK with me. Most of you may not recognize the name "Jack Layton", a Canadian politician who passed mid-last-year. He was Leader of the Opposition, having won a landslide in Quebec (thanks to his bilingualism and much to the shock of the Parti Quebecois, but that's another story).
Back when Jack and his soon-to-become wife Olivia Chow were City Councillors in Toronto, and the leading software at the time was DOS on IBM-PCs or clones, I wrote the campaign-management software for Jack and OC (that became her nickname). The software was not especially complex; just a couple of dozen tables and a lot of time-sensitive reports. But it did the trick, and in some small way helped Jack and OC hold their positions. I did all that work gratis (free), and took pride in helping, in my small way, the advance of two people who I felt would enhance the political landscape in Canada. I am proud to have made this small contribution to the advance of the NDP agenda within Toronto, and Ontario, and Canada.
The saddest part about this story is that less than a year after Jack's triumph (and the NDP's triumph), Jack passed away from cancer. This might rank as the saddest event in the history of Canadian national politics. Jack redefined the political landscape in Canada, and sadly didn't live long enough to enjoy the fruits of his triumph. This fills me with profound sadness. We go back to the days when he and Olivia were City Counsellors in Toronto. I have known them both since then, even before they were married, and when a departed friend called Dan Heap was still part of the equation.
I began with Jack in the days of DOS. I fondly recall a day in his office. I was the DBA guy and was allowed entry to his office. His DOS computer was passworded. It took me all of three minutes to get past that, and to update his campaign software. When later that day, he arrived at his office and found me working on his updates, he asked, "How did you get in?" And I replied, "Who do you want to keep out? Your average user, or me? Two different levels of protection are required."
This was decades ago, and penetration was easier back then. It remains easy, given certain knowledge, but back then all it took was a reboot from a floppy; now it is (slightly more, but not much) more complicated. Unless you're seriously into computing and programming and security, I venture that I can get in within an hour -- not that I have that intention, but it's not very complicated to penetrate almost every allegedly secure site. Rocket science is not required, in many cases I have investigated.
Most people use immediately-remembered identities such as birthyear, birthmonth+day, surname spelled backwards, nickname of first-born-daughter + initial of one's surname. All such passwords are easily grabbed, knowing even a trite of data about the target. Hence, you are a target. I confess that my own account (too easily deduced) has been compromised, and that's when I learned my lesson; and my lesson is this. Make sure that:
1. Your password consists of at least 10 characters.
2, Your password includes at least a few Capitals, Lower Case letters, and Special Case characters.
3. In case you forget it, that you can deduce it from a Hint or two (for example, My Youngest Sibling; what is not declared is that this name should be entered backwards, right to left, and prepended and suffixed by some special characters. The point is, that if you forget what the password is, you can deduce it from a relatively simple set of rules, known only to you.
A.
Sunday, 29 January 2012
On Dwarf-Tossing
A strip club in Windsor, Ontario, Canada, has recently introduced dwarf-tossing in its list of events, the main other one being T,&A, and occasionally P. This raises several ethical points of view:
1. This is an abomination, an insult to dwarfs and midgets and other short people of various ethnicities.
2. This is a legitimate job, and given the context of a strip club, perhaps more honourable than the main event. As I heard an Aussie interviewed by CBC Radio say, "I am a professional projectile."
3. Said dwarfs typically wear protective padding, almost but not quite guaranteeing their lack of harm.
For more information on the subject, see http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Windsor+dwarf+toss+sends+flying/6068322/story.html. But a Google on "dwarf tossing" will deliver numerous other citations.
Where do you stand on this pressing issue? Inquiring minds want to know!
Arthur
1. This is an abomination, an insult to dwarfs and midgets and other short people of various ethnicities.
2. This is a legitimate job, and given the context of a strip club, perhaps more honourable than the main event. As I heard an Aussie interviewed by CBC Radio say, "I am a professional projectile."
3. Said dwarfs typically wear protective padding, almost but not quite guaranteeing their lack of harm.
For more information on the subject, see http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Windsor+dwarf+toss+sends+flying/6068322/story.html. But a Google on "dwarf tossing" will deliver numerous other citations.
Where do you stand on this pressing issue? Inquiring minds want to know!
Arthur
Saturday, 28 January 2012
Austerity schmausterity
In response to the economic crisis of 2008, Europe's policy makers decreed that taxpayers must bail out the banks that caused the economic crisis, and at the same time see their social safety nets severely cut by "austerity" programs. Europeans were told there was no alternative. Spending cuts would make markets more "confident", thus offsetting the effects of the spending cuts.
Some economists including Paul Krugman and Brad Delong said there's no such thing as a "confidence fairy", but austerity was music to new British PM David Cameron's ears--a banker-friendly rationale for punishing the poor and further enriching the wealthy with the proceeds. US Republicans and the European Central Bank took up the same tune.
What's happened has confirmed the Krugman view. Austerity is driving the UK and Greece deeper into their economic holes. Bailing out bankers while punishing the voters paying for the bailout doesn't grow prosperity and hasn't restored market confidence. The people of Spain and Italy and Ireland are victims too as their governments reduce themselves to the status of third-world countries having to borrow in someone else’s currency. Austerity has failed everywhere it's been tried.
And there's a demonstration of what works better. Iceland was deeper in economic poop than anybody, but it let the banks go bust, told international banks to get stuffed, and expanded its social safety net. What's the result? Iceland's social safety net is mostly intact, and its economy is recovering.
Even if Angela Merkel, the ECB, David Cameron and the US Republicans once actually believed in the confidence fairy, the results are in, and they can't believe in it now without slipping into delusion.
What's driving austerity then? One thing is continuing belief by the rich that the poor deserve their lot. How convenient it is that such policies make the rich richer and the poor poorer.
Austerity is what we get when rightwing ideologues hijack a crisis in the service of their political agendas.
Some economists including Paul Krugman and Brad Delong said there's no such thing as a "confidence fairy", but austerity was music to new British PM David Cameron's ears--a banker-friendly rationale for punishing the poor and further enriching the wealthy with the proceeds. US Republicans and the European Central Bank took up the same tune.
What's happened has confirmed the Krugman view. Austerity is driving the UK and Greece deeper into their economic holes. Bailing out bankers while punishing the voters paying for the bailout doesn't grow prosperity and hasn't restored market confidence. The people of Spain and Italy and Ireland are victims too as their governments reduce themselves to the status of third-world countries having to borrow in someone else’s currency. Austerity has failed everywhere it's been tried.
And there's a demonstration of what works better. Iceland was deeper in economic poop than anybody, but it let the banks go bust, told international banks to get stuffed, and expanded its social safety net. What's the result? Iceland's social safety net is mostly intact, and its economy is recovering.
Even if Angela Merkel, the ECB, David Cameron and the US Republicans once actually believed in the confidence fairy, the results are in, and they can't believe in it now without slipping into delusion.
What's driving austerity then? One thing is continuing belief by the rich that the poor deserve their lot. How convenient it is that such policies make the rich richer and the poor poorer.
Austerity is what we get when rightwing ideologues hijack a crisis in the service of their political agendas.
Wednesday, 25 January 2012
As Good as It Gets
My list of great movies is not complete without a mention of this one. Winner of two Academy Awards (Jack Nicholson for Best Actor and Helen Hunt for Best Actress, it should have won at least four more: Greg Kinnear for Best Supporting Actor, Shirley Knight as Helen's mom, and Mark Andrus and James L. Brooks for Best Screenplay. It was nominated for these and others (Best Picture, Best Editing, Best Score) but somehow didn't win those.
I've seen this movie at least a dozen times; I have memorized almost the entire script. Typically, a comedy doesn't stand up to that many viewings without inducing boredom. But As Good as It Gets is more than just a hilarious comedy. Its characters are so well drawn they become part of your life. Some of the lines of dialog are simply priceless. Jack as Melvin Udall gets most of them, but Helen and Greg and Shirley get some memorable lines too.
It's impossible to recommend this movie too highly. If you haven't seen it, run to the nearest DVD outlet (assuming there still is one in your neighbourhood) and rent or buy it at once.
I've seen this movie at least a dozen times; I have memorized almost the entire script. Typically, a comedy doesn't stand up to that many viewings without inducing boredom. But As Good as It Gets is more than just a hilarious comedy. Its characters are so well drawn they become part of your life. Some of the lines of dialog are simply priceless. Jack as Melvin Udall gets most of them, but Helen and Greg and Shirley get some memorable lines too.
It's impossible to recommend this movie too highly. If you haven't seen it, run to the nearest DVD outlet (assuming there still is one in your neighbourhood) and rent or buy it at once.
File Sharing Services Panic
In the wake of the shutdown of Megaupload, the seizure of its servers and the arrest of its principals and several employees, other file-sharing services have either diminished their services or shut down completely. Here is a brief rundown of such services and their reactions:
- Fileserve – Stopped filesharing. You can only download your own files. Deleting multiple files. Banning Premium accounts. Closed Affiliate Program.
- FileSonic – A red banner on the site's main page now informs visitors that "All sharing functionality on FileSonic is now disabled. Our service can only be used to upload and retrieve files that you have uploaded personally."
- VideoBB – Closed Affiliate Program.
- Filepost – Started suspending accounts with infringing material (as Hotfile did).
- Uploaded.to – Blocked U.S. access.
- Videozer – Closed Affiliate Program.
- Filejungle – Owned by Fileserve (same as above). Testing USA IP addresses blocking.
- Uploadstation – Owned by Fileserve (same as above). Testing USA IP addresses blocking.
- 4Shared – Deleting multiple files.
- EnterUpload - Down (Redirect).
Changed server location Jan 22, 2012. Has taken down its Facebook page. Now using Digital fingerprinting. Files are being deleted as soon as uploaded (as Hotfile did).
Arthur
Tuesday, 24 January 2012
Is Canadian Culture Dead, and If So, Did the CRTC Kill It?
Several recent posts on SlashDot concern the death of Canadian culture, and the perpetrator of said death is attributed to the CRTC (Canadian Radio and Television Commission). Here is a quote selected from SlashDot's thread on this, followed by my response:
Basically Canada is still going through issues trying to figure out what it means to be Canadian. A large part of how many Canadians seem to define themselves as as "not American" hence the "little brother" syndrome I talk about. They are like a little kid who is saying what they are is the things the big kid is not.
This isn't such a problem for the average man on the street, of course, but it is a big issue for the government and various folks. They have a real issue with trying to decide what it is to be Canadian and protecting that. There are even things like laws requiring a certain amount of content on TV and radio to be Canadian in origin.
My reply:
While I agree with your characterization in very general strokes, I also point out that a significant minority does not have this problem. To this I cite Canadian pop music, for starters.
Music: I have a friend in Florida who has emailed me about the phenomenal female talent coming out of Canada, from Joni to Nelly to Alanis to Sarah. That will do for starters, but let's toss in:
Pop -- Celine Dion, Robert Charlebois, Boule Noir, Lhasa, Robbie Robertson, Leonard Cohen and his son Adam, Neil Young, Burton Cummings, Randy Bachman, Robert Goulet and many more.
Classical -- Ofra Harnoy (cello), James Ennis (viiolin), and a few operatic tenors and sopranos and altos.
TV series sold around the world: "Anna of Green Gables", "Heartland", "FlashPoint", "daVinci" and everything else Chris Haddock created, my favourite being "Intelligence".
Cinema -- David Cronenberg's entire ouevre, James Cameron, all the work of Atom Egoyan, and all the celebrated contributions of NFB, and that's only for starters. Add to this a few films such as Point 45.
"Literature": Margaret Atwood, Mistry Rohinton, Farley Mowat, Malcolm Lowry, Mordecai Richler, Alice Munro, Michale Ondaatje, Gabrielle Roy, Douglas Copeland, Dim Unrespected
S-F literature: William Gibson, Ursula Guinn and Robert J. Sawyer, , for starters.
Non-fiction: Pierre Berton, Peter C. Newman, Marshall McLuhan Roch Carier, Douglas Copeland, William Gibson, J.K. Galbraith, Steven Pinker, and the list goes on.
Comedy:, That list is endless, but it begins with Lorne Michael, founder of Saturday Night Live, who hired numerous Canadian humourists, but let's begin that list with Russell Peters, then include Jim Carrey, John Belushi, John Candy, Dan Ackroyd,and the list goes on.
Actors: Donald and Keifer Sutherland, Keannu Reeves, Gordon Pinsent, Catherine O'Hara, Eugene Levy, Alexandra Stewart, and thousands of others.
Canadian culture is no more in peril than Quebecois culture, which is thriving. I daresay that so is Canadian culture. We are not in peril at all.
Back to the intiial point: is the CRTC a protector of Canadian culture or a threat to it? There are several answers to this question. Admittedly, the restriction that ratio stations play a mandated percentage of Canadian artists definitely did help Canadian musicians conquer the world. There is no dispute about this.
But I would argue that the mission is mis-stated: rather than mandate Canadian content, I would argue the other side: that foreign content be restricted by percentage. Arbitrarily choosing a number, I propose that content by nation ought to be restricted thus: the maximum content from any other country be restricted to 20% of the total broadcast.
Canadian culture is not suffering. I daresay that it is thriving! I would also say that the CRTC's mission is obsolete. We are thriving! Everyone knows that Celine and David and Donald and Keifer and Jim and Martin (Short) and Lorne Micheals and John Candy and Denis Arcand and Nelly and Joni and Norah and Leonard are Canadian!
I don't think that I fit into this company, but I have published several non-fiction books, all about database programming, so I fit somewhere, at the lowest levels, in this list.
A.
Saturday, 21 January 2012
The End of DUI
There's a nice piece in Wired, Feb 2012, "The Robot Drive; The autonomous car of the future is here". Google, Mercedes and BMW all have autonomous, auto-driven, cars in the works. The potential up-side is that you can get as hammered as you want in your local waterhole, and then stumble into your car and say, "Home, Jeeves", and thou shalt arrive safely at home, intact and beneath the radar.
Unfortunately, one problem persists: how are you to make it from the parked automobile to the doorway of your house? We're working on it; perhaps a robot equipped for rain and snow, waiting at the front door or the garage door, holding an arm akimbo and waiting for you to catch hold, then gracefully guiding you into your home.
The stairs to the bedroom present the next problem, not in itself insurmountable. You could even install an Acorn Stairlift to get you up the stairs to the bedroom.
But then comes the truly insurmountable problem: upon arrival in the boudoir, what does one say to one's spouse? On that question, technology falls on its face.
Arthur
Unfortunately, one problem persists: how are you to make it from the parked automobile to the doorway of your house? We're working on it; perhaps a robot equipped for rain and snow, waiting at the front door or the garage door, holding an arm akimbo and waiting for you to catch hold, then gracefully guiding you into your home.
The stairs to the bedroom present the next problem, not in itself insurmountable. You could even install an Acorn Stairlift to get you up the stairs to the bedroom.
But then comes the truly insurmountable problem: upon arrival in the boudoir, what does one say to one's spouse? On that question, technology falls on its face.
Arthur
Cloud Storage: I wouldn't bet on it
Do you store your data on a public cloud? Would you consider it? Not me, thank you. I've had serious doubts about this technology since it was introduced, and although I hate to say "I told you so", I told you so.
Recently (January 19, 2012), Megaupload was shut down. Its computers and toys (including some monster TVs and a clutch of Mercedes automobiles) were seized, not to mention somewhere around a thousand servers. If you have -- er, had -- any files stored there, color them Gone. Theoretically, they are in limbo, rather than actually gone. But you won't get them back unless and until the seven Megaupload people arrested are eventually found innocent, and given the speed of swift justice, that will take years.
There are lots of cloud-storage companies, some of which are subsidiaries of giants like Microsoft and Google. Their sheer size doesn't make them immune, either to the DOJ or to the whims of malicious hackers, which is why I've refused to board this train. There's no way in the world I would upload anything to such a site without a local backup of said data, and that rather defeats the point. The only valid reason that I can see to do this is to gain access to the files no matter where you are. This does not solve the problem, but merely relocates it. Should you update the cloud-file(s) from anywhere, then you need to copy the updates back to your location. If you're not at home or work, then hopefully you have a memory stick with you. 64-gig sticks are available now, for less than a dollar a gig, so it's feasible, unless the file you're updating is a database.
To the list of Things That Could Go Wrong, we should add Bankruptcy. In that event, you might not even receive advance notice and the chance to migrate your files to some other cloud provider. In the case of intervention by the DOJ or some equivalent, you can rest assured that all your unencrypted data will be inspected, if only to buttress the argument that criminal activity (copyright violations, possession of kiddie-porn, etc.) was taking place. The irony is, even and perhaps especially, if your data on the cloud is encrypted, a closer inspection is warranted. If you have nothing to hide, why bother with encryption? In that light, encryption borders on admission of guilt.
My advice: think very carefully before placing your head in a cloud. Ask the vendor what happens in the event of bankruptcy.
Recently (January 19, 2012), Megaupload was shut down. Its computers and toys (including some monster TVs and a clutch of Mercedes automobiles) were seized, not to mention somewhere around a thousand servers. If you have -- er, had -- any files stored there, color them Gone. Theoretically, they are in limbo, rather than actually gone. But you won't get them back unless and until the seven Megaupload people arrested are eventually found innocent, and given the speed of swift justice, that will take years.
There are lots of cloud-storage companies, some of which are subsidiaries of giants like Microsoft and Google. Their sheer size doesn't make them immune, either to the DOJ or to the whims of malicious hackers, which is why I've refused to board this train. There's no way in the world I would upload anything to such a site without a local backup of said data, and that rather defeats the point. The only valid reason that I can see to do this is to gain access to the files no matter where you are. This does not solve the problem, but merely relocates it. Should you update the cloud-file(s) from anywhere, then you need to copy the updates back to your location. If you're not at home or work, then hopefully you have a memory stick with you. 64-gig sticks are available now, for less than a dollar a gig, so it's feasible, unless the file you're updating is a database.
To the list of Things That Could Go Wrong, we should add Bankruptcy. In that event, you might not even receive advance notice and the chance to migrate your files to some other cloud provider. In the case of intervention by the DOJ or some equivalent, you can rest assured that all your unencrypted data will be inspected, if only to buttress the argument that criminal activity (copyright violations, possession of kiddie-porn, etc.) was taking place. The irony is, even and perhaps especially, if your data on the cloud is encrypted, a closer inspection is warranted. If you have nothing to hide, why bother with encryption? In that light, encryption borders on admission of guilt.
My advice: think very carefully before placing your head in a cloud. Ask the vendor what happens in the event of bankruptcy.
Friday, 20 January 2012
Apple: Digital Feudalists
A few days ago, when Apple announced its new and ostensibly revolutionary iBooks publishing software, it claimed to be on the verge of revolutionizing the publication and distribution of textbooks. After looking over the EULA that comes with the software, methinks NOT.
Check this out:
Check this out:
B. Distribution of your Work. As a condition of this License and provided you are in compliance with its terms, your Work may be distributed as follows:
- (i) if your Work is provided for free (at no charge), you may distribute the Work by any available means;
- (ii) if your Work is provided for a fee (including as part of any subscription-based product or
service), you may only distribute the Work through Apple and such distribution is subject to the following limitations and conditions: (a) you will be required to enter into a separate written agreement with Apple (or an Apple affiliate or subsidiary) before any commercial distribution of your Work may take place; and (b) Apple may determine for any reason and in its sole discretion not to select your Work for distribution.
Consider this in a similar light: if you're a public speaker, charging an appearance fee and using a PowerPoint slide show in your presentation. By the clauses outlined above, you would have to give Microsoft a piece of your action.
Lest the above clauses seem too vague, the Apple EULA goes even further:
(Their bold-face, not mine.)Apple will not be responsible for any costs, expenses, damages, losses (including
without limitation lost business opportunities or lost profits) or other liabilities you mayincur as a result of your use of this Apple Software, including without limitation the fact that your Work may not be selected for distribution by Apple.
Read that paragraph slowly and carefully. Suppose that you spend the next several months writing and formatting your work into a specimen of shocking and brilliant prose. Then you submit it, only to find that for whatever reason, Apple rejects it. What rights is Apple claiming? Here it gets interesting. You can submit the work elsewhere, but not in the form in which it currently resides. First you must strip the document of all its markup language, reducing it to plain text, and then mark it up in another language such as the industry standard EPUB. The agreement states that Apple iBooks uses the EPUB format, but won't allow a 100% compatible export, even using the Save As (.iBooks, then rename the result to .EPUB). Depending upon the interpretation of the agreement, however, even this output might be deemed covered by the egregious clauses.
When we first heard of this new software, my co-author Peter Brawley and I greeted it with enthusiasm. Second and third readings of the EULA have pretty much dissipated our initial take. At this point, our advice to would-be iBooks authors is simple: read and re-read the EULA carefully, and when you are sufficiently dizzied by its language, have your lawyer read it too. And if you still want to walk into this feudal arrangement, we wish you the best of luck.
Arthur
Thursday, 19 January 2012
Digital Detox
I heard a sad but poignant story on a CBC phone-in program yesterday, on the topic of Digital Detox. This is not so much a physical place like a drug-detox centre, but rather a self-imposed withdrawal from Blackberry, iTab and smartphones. Before I get to the story, I want to mention one great idea that a caller mentioned: at a social gathering of friends or colleagues, the first one to reach for his or her Blackberry etc. picks up the tab.
Now the story: The guest of the show was a woman who found her young daughter walking around the house, carrying a doll and her mother's old Blackberry. She asked her daughter what she was doing, and her daughter replied, "I'm playing house. Just like you."
That's when she realized the extent of her addiction. Her daughter thought being a Mommy required a Blackberry. And that's when she went into Digital Detox.
I don't have a Blackberry or an iPad or a smartphone. All I have is a rather stupid cell phone. It does text and email and music, but I've never used any of those features. To me it's a phone, period. I do maintain a list of frequently-called numbers, but that's about the extent of it.
How about you? How long can you go without a "hit" from your smart device? A weekend? A day? An hour?
Arthur
Now the story: The guest of the show was a woman who found her young daughter walking around the house, carrying a doll and her mother's old Blackberry. She asked her daughter what she was doing, and her daughter replied, "I'm playing house. Just like you."
That's when she realized the extent of her addiction. Her daughter thought being a Mommy required a Blackberry. And that's when she went into Digital Detox.
I don't have a Blackberry or an iPad or a smartphone. All I have is a rather stupid cell phone. It does text and email and music, but I've never used any of those features. To me it's a phone, period. I do maintain a list of frequently-called numbers, but that's about the extent of it.
How about you? How long can you go without a "hit" from your smart device? A weekend? A day? An hour?
Arthur
Chinese Inventions
A while ago I read a wonderful book called The Man Who Loved China, by Simon Winchester. It details the life of Richard Needham, who spent most of his life studying and documenting the history of Chinese culture. Originally from England, he moved to New York to study, and there met a Mandarin-speaking Chinese woman. With her help, he learned to read, speak and write Mandarin in a year (as one attempting to learn Mandarin, I can attest to how formidable accomplishment this is). During World War II, he moved to China, originally to help the Chinese army to fend off Japan by touring the country and finding out what materiel was needed. Said materiel was then shipped to India and from there transported overland into China. Everywhere he went, Needham visited universities, monasteries and technical facilities, gathering every nugget he could about Chinese history and culture. He managed to persuade a publisher to publish what was intended to be a book on the subject, to be delivered within a year. Eventually the material was published -- in a set consisting of 16 volumes! Even today, Needham is regarded as the world's foremost scholar of Chinese culture.
The Man Who Loved China closes with an appendix listing Chinese inventions and their date of appearance (or first mention; in some cases the mentions post-date the inventions). This list is quite shocking to most Westerners, as is the narrow-mindedness of many Western historians. (Fortunately, this is changing.) Sometimes even the terminology reveals this. For example, see "Pasteurization" in the list below.
I have taken the liberty of typing the list in from the book. I'm quite sure that at least a few entries will shock and surprise you, especially when you realize how many centuries earlier the Chinese invention was than the European "invention". Here it is.
Arthur
The Man Who Loved China closes with an appendix listing Chinese inventions and their date of appearance (or first mention; in some cases the mentions post-date the inventions). This list is quite shocking to most Westerners, as is the narrow-mindedness of many Western historians. (Fortunately, this is changing.) Sometimes even the terminology reveals this. For example, see "Pasteurization" in the list below.
I have taken the liberty of typing the list in from the book. I'm quite sure that at least a few entries will shock and surprise you, especially when you realize how many centuries earlier the Chinese invention was than the European "invention". Here it is.
Abacus
|
AD 190
|
Acupuncture
|
580 BC
|
Advisory vessels
|
3rd Century BC
|
Air-conditioning fan
|
AD 180
|
Alcohol made from grain by a special fermentation process
|
15th Century BC
|
Algorithm for extraction of square and cube roots
|
1st Century BC
|
Anatomy
|
11th Century AD
|
Anchor, non-folding, stockless
|
1st Century AD
|
Anemometer
|
3rd Century AD
|
Anti-malaria drugs
|
3rd Century AD
|
Arcuballista, multi-bolt
|
320 BC
|
Acruballista, multiple-spring
|
5th Century AD
|
Asbestos woven into cloth
|
3rd Century AD
|
Astronomical clock drive
|
120 AD
|
Axial rudder
|
1st Century AD
|
Ball Bearings
|
2nd Century BC
|
Balloon principle
|
2nd Century BC
|
Bean Curd
|
100 AD
|
Bell, pottery
|
3rd millennium BC
|
Bellows, double-acting piston-turned bronze
|
6th Century BC
|
Belt drive
|
5th Century BC
|
Beriberi, recognition of
|
1130 AD
|
Blast furnace
|
3rd Century BC
|
Blood, distinction of arterial and veinous
|
2nd Century BC
|
Blood, theory of circulation
|
2nd Century BC
|
Boats and ships, paddle-wheel
|
418 AD
|
Bomb, cast-iron
|
1221 AD
|
Bomb, thrown from a trebucher
|
|
Book, printed, first to be dated
|
868 AD
|
Book, scientific, printed
|
847 AD
|
Bookcase, vertical axis
|
544 AD
|
Bookworm repellent
|
|
Bowl, bronze, water-spouting
|
3rd Century BC
|
Bread, steamed
|
|
Bridges, releasable
|
4th Century BC
|
Bridges, iron-chain suspension
|
6th Century AD
|
Bridges, Li Chun’s Segmental Arch
|
610 AD
|
Bronze, high tin for mirror production
|
|
Bronze, rainbow teng (camphor still)
|
1st Century BC
|
Calipers
|
9 AD
|
Camera Obscura, explanation of
|
1086 AD
|
“Candan” suspension
|
140 BC
|
Cast iron
|
5th Century BC
|
Cast iron-malleable
|
4th Century BC
|
Cereals, preservation of stored
|
1st Century BC
|
Chain drive
|
976 AD
|
Chess
|
4th Century BC
|
Chimes, stone
|
9th Century BC
|
Chopsticks
|
600 BC
|
Clocks, sand
|
1370 AD
|
Clocks, Su Sung’s
|
1088 AD
|
Clockwork Escapement of Yi Xing and Liang Lingzan
|
725 AD
|
Coal, as a fuel
|
1st Century AD
|
Coal dust, briquettes from
|
1st Century AD
|
Coinage
|
9th Century BC
|
Collapsible umbrella and other items
|
5th Century BC
|
Comet tails, observation of direction of
|
635 AD
|
Compass, floating fish
|
1027 AD
|
Compass, magnetic needle
|
1088 AD
|
Cooking pots, heat economy in
|
3rd Millennium BC
|
Crank handle
|
1st Century BC
|
Crop rotation
|
6th Century BC
|
Crossbow
|
5th Century BC
|
Crossbow, bronze triggers
|
300 BC
|
Crossbow, grid sight for
|
1st Century AD
|
Crossbow, magazine
|
13th Century AD
|
Dating of trees by number of rings
|
12th Century AD
|
Decimal place value
|
13th Century BC
|
Deep drilling and use of natural gas as fuel
|
2nd Century BC
|
Diabetes, association with sweet and fatty foods
|
1st Century BC
|
Dial and pointer
|
3rd Century BC
|
Differential pressure
|
|
Disease, diurnal rhythms in
|
2nd Century BC
|
Diseases, deficiency
|
3rd Century AD
|
Dishing of carriage wheel
|
|
Distillation of mercury
|
3rd Century BC
|
Dominoes
|
1120 AD
|
Downdraft
|
1st Century BC
|
Dragon kiln
|
2nd Century AD
|
Draw Loom
|
1st Century AD
|
Drum carriage
|
1st Century AD
|
Diked/poldered fields
|
1st Century BC
|
Ephedrine
|
2nd Century AD
|
Equal temperament, mathematical formulation of
|
AD 1584
|
Equilibrium, theory of
|
4th Century BC
|
Erosion and sedimentary deposition, theory of
|
AD 1070
|
Esculentist movement (edible plants for time of famine)
|
AD 1046
|
Ever-normal granary system
|
AD 9
|
Fertilizers
|
2nd Century BC
|
Firecrackers
|
AD 290
|
Firelance
|
AD 950
|
Flame test
|
|
Flame-thrower (double-acting force pump for liquids)
|
AD 919
|
Folding chairs
|
3rd Century AD
|
Free reed
|
100 BC
|
Fumigation
|
7th Century BC
|
Furnace, reverberatory
|
1st Century BC
|
Gabions
|
3rd Century BC
|
Gauges, rain and snow
|
AD 1247
|
Gear-wheels, chevron-toothed
|
AD 50
|
Ginning machine, hand-cranked and treadle
|
17th Century AD
|
Gluten from wheat
|
AD 530
|
Gold, purple sheen
|
200 BC
|
Grafting
|
AD 806
|
Gravimetry
|
AD 712
|
Great Wall of China
|
3rd Century BC
|
Gird technique, quantitative, used in cartography
|
AD 1130
|
Guan Xien system
|
240 BC
|
Gunpowder, formula for
|
12th Century AD
|
Gunpowder, government’s department and monopoly on
|
14th Century AD
|
Gunpowder, used in mining
|
Ming
|
Handcarts
|
681 BC
|
Handgun
|
AD 1128
|
Harness, boot strap
|
250 BC
|
Harness, collar
|
AD 477
|
Helicopter top
|
AD 320
|
High temperatures, firing of clay at
|
2nd Millennium BC
|
Hodometer
|
110 BC
|
Holing irons
|
AD 584
|
“Hot streak” test
|
AD 1596
|
Hygrometer
|
120 BC
|
Indeterminate analysyis
|
|
Interconversion of longitudinal and rotary motion
|
AD 31
|
Kite
|
4th Century BC
|
Knife, rotary disk, for cutting jade
|
12th Century AD
|
Lacquer
|
13th Century BC
|
Ladders, extendable
|
4th Century BC
|
Leeboards and centerboards
|
AD 751
|
Lodestone, south-pointing ladle
|
AD 83
|
Magic mirrors
|
5th Century AD
|
Magic squares
|
AD 190
|
Magnetic declination noted
|
AD 1040
|
Magnetic thermoremanence and induction
|
AD 1044
|
Magnetic variation observed
|
AD 1436
|
Magnetism, used in medicine
|
AD 970
|
Malt sugar, production of
|
1st Millennium BC
|
Mangonel
|
4th Century BC
|
Maps, relief
|
AD 1086
|
Maps, typographical
|
3rd Century BC
|
Masts, multiple
|
3rd Century AD
|
Matches (non-striking)
|
AD 577
|
Melodic composition
|
AD 475
|
Metal amalgams used to fill cavities
|
AD 659
|
Metal, to oxides, burning of
|
5th Century BC
|
Mill, wagon
|
AD 340
|
Mills, edge-runner
|
200 BC
|
Mills, edge-runner, water-power applied
|
4th Century AD
|
Mining, square sets for
|
5th Century BC
|
Mining, differential pressure ventilation
|
5th Century BC
|
Mirror, with “light-penetration surface”
|
11th Century BC
|
Mold board
|
2nd Century BC
|
Mountings, vertical and horizontal
|
1st Century AD
|
Mouth-organs
|
9th Century BC
|
Moxibustion
|
3rd Century BC
|
Multiple-spindle silk-twisting frame
|
AD 1313
|
Negative numbers, operations using
|
1st Century AD
|
Noodles (filamentous) including bread
|
AD 100
|
Nova, recorded observation of
|
13th Century BC
|
Numerical equations of higher order, solution of
|
13th Century AD
|
Oil lamps, economic
|
9th Century AD
|
Paktong (cupronickel)
|
AD 230
|
Paper (invention of)
|
300 BC
|
Paper, money
|
9th Century AD
|
Paper, toilet
|
AD 589
|
Paper, wall
|
16th Century AD
|
Paper, wrapping
|
2nd Century BC
|
Parachute principle
|
8th Century AD
|
“Pascal” triangle of binomial coefficients
|
AD 1100
|
Pasteurization of wine
|
AD 1117
|
Pearl fishing conservancy
|
2nd Century AD
|
Pearls in oysters, artificial induction of
|
AD 1086
|
“Pi”, accurate estimation of
|
3rd Century AD
|
Piece molding for casting bronze
|
2nd Millennium BC
|
Place-value number system
|
13th Century BC
|
Placenta used as source of estrogen
|
AD 725
|
Planispheres
|
AD 940
|
Plant protection, biological
|
AD 304
|
Planting in rows
|
3rd Century BC
|
Playing cards
|
AD 969
|
Polar-equatorial coordinates
|
1st Century BC
|
Polar-equatorial mounting of astronomical instruments
|
AD 1270
|
Porcelain
|
3rd Century BC
|
Potassium, flame-test used in identifying
|
3rd Century AD
|
Pound-lock canal gates
|
AD 984
|
Preservation of corpses
|
166 BC
|
Printing, bronze type
|
AD 1403
|
Printing, movable earthenware type on paper
|
11th Century AD
|
Printing, multicolor
|
12th Century AD
|
Printing, with woodblocks
|
7th Century AD
|
Propeller-oar, self-feathering
|
AD 100
|
Prospecting, biogeochemical
|
6th Century AD
|
Prospecting, geological
|
4th Century BC
|
Qin and se zither
|
|
Recording of sun halves, parhelic specters, and Lowitz
arcs
|
AD 635
|
Reed on fishing rod
|
3rd Century AD
|
Refraction
|
4th Century BC
|
Rocket arrow
|
13th Century AD
|
Rocket arrow launchers
|
AD 1370
|
Rocket arrows, winged
|
AD 1360
|
Rockets, two-staged
|
AD 1360
|
Roller-harrows
|
AD 880
|
Rotary ballista
|
AD 240
|
Rotary fan
|
1st Cnetury BC
|
Sailing carriage
|
16th Century AD
|
Sails, mat and batten
|
1st Century AD
|
Salvage, underwater
|
AD 1064
|
Seawalls
|
AD 80
|
Seed, pre-treatment of
|
1st Century BC
|
Seed drill, multiple tube
|
AD 155
|
“Seedling horse”
|
11th Century AD
|
Seismograh
|
AD 132
|
Ships, construction principle of
|
1st Century BC
|
Silk, earliest spinning of
|
2850 BC
|
Silk reeling machine
|
AD 1090
|
Silk warp doubling and throwing frame
|
10th Century AD
|
Sluices
|
3rd Century BC
|
Sluices, riffles added to
|
11th Century AD
|
Smallpox, inoculation against
|
10th Century AD
|
Smokescreens
|
AD 178
|
Snow crystals, six-sided symmetry of
|
135 BC
|
Soil science (ecology)
|
5th Century BC
|
South-pointing carriage
|
AD 120
|
Soybean, fermented
|
200 BC
|
Sprouts, for medicinal and nutritional purposes
|
2nd Century BC
|
Spindle wheel
|
5th Century BC
|
Spindle wheel, multiple spindle
|
11th Century AD
|
Spindle wheel, treadle-operated
|
1st Century AD
|
Spooling frame
|
AD 1313
|
Square pallet chain pump
|
AD 186
|
Stalactites and stalagmites, records of
|
4th Century BC
|
Stars, proper motion of
|
AD 725
|
Steamers, pottery
|
5th millennium BC
|
Steel production, co-fusion method of
|
6th Century AD
|
Sterilization by steaming
|
AD 980
|
Steroids, urinary
|
AD 1025
|
Still, Chinese-type
|
7th Century AD
|
Stirrup
|
AD 300
|
Stringed instruments
|
9th Century BC
|
Tea, as drink
|
2nd Century BC
|
Thyroid treatment
|
1st Century BC
|
Tian yuan algebraic notation
|
AD 1248
|
Tilt-hammer, water-powered spoon
|
AD 1145
|
Toothbrush
|
9th Century AD
|
Trebuchet (simple)
|
4th Century BC
|
Trip hammers
|
2nd Century BC
|
Trip hammers, water-powered
|
AD 20
|
Vinegar
|
2nd Century BC
|
Water mills, geared
|
3rd Century AD
|
Waterwheel, horizontal
|
AD 31
|
Weather vane
|
120 BC
|
Wet copper method
|
11th Century AD
|
Wheelbarrow, centrally mounted
|
30 BC
|
Wheelbarrow, with sails
|
6th Century AD
|
Windlass, well
|
120 BC
|
Windows, revolving
|
5th Century BC
|
Winnowing machine
|
1st Century AD
|
Zoetrope
|
AD 180
|
Arthur
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)